5 Arguments Insurance Companies Use to Deny Your Injury Claim

Posted on
Injury claim denied
If you are having trouble with your injury claim, contact the attorneys at Krause & Kinsman

When you’ve been through the pain of an automobile accident, the last thing you want to be told is that you’re going to be stuck with the expenses too. According to research by the Rocky Mountain Insurance Information Association, car wrecks cost America roughly $1 trillion each year, when you take into account lost life, earnings, property damages, and other related losses. But auto insurance companies still manage to make billions in profits. How? By collecting premiums and denying claims. Here are just five of the most common, yet terrible, arguments that insurance companies use to deny a legitimate injury claim.

  1. You Were Hurt Before (a.k.a. Pre-existing Injury)

This is probably the most frequent excuse used. Here is how it works.  The insurance company tells you they need you to sign a medical records release. Then, they go through your treatment records and discover that five years ago, you saw your family doctor because of a pulled muscle in your shoulder. The next thing you know, the adjuster is explaining that they will have to ‘reduce’ the amount of your payment, because your injuries are ‘pre-existing.’

  1. You Were Mostly to Blame (a.k.a. Comparative Fault)

This is when an insurance company thinks it can get away with blaming you for your own injuries.  There are a lot of ways to distribute blame among different parties to an accident. In some states, if you are even 51 percent to blame, you cannot recover anything. In other states, if you are even slightly at fault, you cannot recover at all. In Missouri, we use a pure comparative fault model. This means that you are responsible for your share of the blame. If the other driver is even partially to blame, you can collect up to that amount for your injuries.

  1. Your Medical Treatment Was Unreasonable (a.k.a. Too Expensive)

Again, this is just a clever way of saying the insurance company doesn’t want to pay for your loss. Insurance companies regularly try to argue that x-rays, hospital stays, surgeries, or medications are too expensive. Of course, it’s important to remember that the injured victim did not get a say in how much an ambulance ride or hospital visit would cost. The victim did not choose to be injured.

  1. You Waited Too Long to Get Help (a.k.a. Delayed Treatment)

Whether you suffer muscle pain and neck aches commonly associated with a whiplash injury or something much more serious, such as a concussion or brain injury, the symptoms can be delayed. Even the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) acknowledges that many of the symptoms of traumatic brain injury can be delayed by days or even months. Nevertheless, insurance adjusters love to tell victims that by waiting two or three days to get treatment, they must not have really been hurt. The science says otherwise.  

  1. Good Old Fashioned Injury Claim Delay

Nothing keeps you from being compensated quite as effectively as an insurance company simply ignoring you, delaying matters, and not returning your calls. Some of the bigger, well-known insurance companies are now even switching the claims handlers every two-three weeks, just so that the claimant can never find the person needed to handle the claim. Some insurance companies change their claims numbers regularly or put incorrect information on letterhead. Ultimately, they want you to wait until the statute of limitations has passed. Then you are forever barred from being compensated.

Getting Aggressive Legal Help for your Injury Claim

There are strict time limits on bringing a lawsuit for your injuries. The attorneys of the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm know exactly what it takes to handle your injury claim from start to finish. And if the insurance company doesn’t want to play by the rules, we aren’t afraid to take your case to trial. Call or contact us online today to schedule your free, no-risk consultation.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.