Answering Your Questions About Uber/Lyft Injuries

Posted on

The percentage of Americans who have used a rideshare service has more than doubled since 2015. Uber, Lyft, and other ridesharing services are clearly popular. But are they safe?

Because so many more people use rideshare services, there are many more drivers than there were a few years ago. Some of these operators over-rely on GPS navigation devices. So, they have one eye on the road and one eye on a screen. Other operators have poor customer service skills. These weaknesses are even more acute in a confined space, like a car.

If you hailed a ride and did not arrive safely at your destination, a Kansas City personal injury attorney fights for the compensation you need and deserve.

Legal Responsibility

Uber drivers, taxi drivers, bus drivers, and other commercial operators who transport passengers are common carriers in Missouri. These individuals have a higher duty of care than noncommercial drivers. So, it is easier to establish liability for damages, as outlined below.

Approaching an intersection is a good example. Noncommercial drivers may proceed forward on green lights. Arguably, however, common carriers have a duty to stop, or at least pause, and look both ways before moving forward.

This duty applies to more than driving. Rideshare operators also have a duty to keep passengers physically safe from pickup to dropoff.

Negligent Injury

Hand-held GPS devices are technically legal in Missouri. But these gadgets are quite distracting. In fact, they combine all three forms of distracted driving, which are:

  • Manual (taking one’s hand off the wheel),
  • Cognitive (taking one’s mind off driving), and
  • Visual (taking one’s eye off the road).

Hands-free navigation devices are more dangerous than hand-held gadgets. Hands-free devices give drivers a false sense of security. So, they often take unnecessary chances. Additionally, hands-free devices are visually and cognitively distracting. 

Typically, personal automobile insurance policies do not cover commercial losses. Fortunately, the respondeat superior rule usually applies in these situations. Employers are financially responsible for the negligent acts of their employees. Missouri law defines these key terms in broad, victim-friendly terms.

Intentional Injury

Many Uber and Lyft operators drive large pickup trucks or SUVs. Getting into and out of these vehicles is often tricky, especially if the victim has a pre-existing condition. Additionally, driver assaults are all too common.

The respondeat superior doctrine is usually inapplicable in these cases. Passenger injuries are not part of the driver’s job description. However, these victims still have legal options. 

Negligent supervision is a good example. Employers cannot simply wind up drivers and let them go. Additionally, if problems occur, employers have a duty to deal with them. Frequently, if a driver assaulted a passenger once, the driver has behaved that way before.

Damages in a rideshare injury claim usually include compensation for economic losses, such as medical bills, and noneconomic losses, such as pain and suffering.

The law holds ridesharing operators to a higher standard of conduct. For a free consultation with an experienced car accident lawyer in Kansas City, contact the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm. You have a limited amount of time to act.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.