Common Medical Negligence Cases

Posted on

There are several common kinds of medical negligence cases, but they all have one thing in common. Doctors and other medical professionals usually have a fiduciary duty toward their patients. That’s the highest duty of care in the law. Since the responsibility is so great, it’s easier to establish medical negligence, which is essentially a lack of care.

This high duty also means that a Kansas City personal injury attorney can obtain substantial compensation for these victims. Families need this money to carry on with life in the wake of the serious incidents described below. This compensation usually includes money for economic losses, such as medical bills, and noneconomic losses, such as pain and suffering. Additional punitive damages are usually available as well.

Misdiagnosis

Confidence is an admirable quality in a doctor, but overconfidence is not. Overconfidence is at the root of many medical misdiagnosis issues. Doctors often approach complex cases with an “I’ve got this” mentality. So, they use their instincts, instead of test-related evidence, to diagnose illnesses.

Cancer is a good example. Many physicians view cancer as a genetic or lifestyle condition. They seldom diagnose lung cancer in nonsmokers or any kind of cancer in people with no family history of this disease.

According to some estimates, the cancer misdiagnosis rate is twice as high as the overall misdiagnosis rate.

Birth Injuries

A different kind of overconfidence often causes birth injuries. When things go wrong in the delivery room, some doctors hesitate to ask for help. They view such pleas as a sign of weakness. Instead, they rely on dangerous birth assistance devices or methods, such as:

  • Episiotomy: Doctors sometimes cut the mother’s perineum (area between the genitals and anus) to widen the birth canal. These incisions often cause uncontrollable bleeding during the delivery and intense pain afterward.
  • Vacuum Extractor: The doctor attaches a metal cap to a partially-born baby’s head, hooks that cap to a surgical vacuum, and tries to suck the baby out of the mother’s body. Tiny newborns are not strong enough to withstand that kind of force.
  • Forceps: Before vacuum extractors came along, doctors used these surgical salad tongs to pry babies out of their mother’s bodies. Doctors still use forceps today. Indeed, the ones in modern delivery rooms aren’t much different from the ones doctors used in the 1700s.

Doctors use risky methods like these because if a baby is too large to drift down the mother’s birth canal, permanent brain damage is just five minutes away.

Misdiagnosis and birth injuries are among the most common medical negligence cases. For a free consultation with an experienced personal injury attorney in Kansas City, contact the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm. After-hours visits are available.

FAQs

How common is medical misdiagnosis?

Doctors misdiagnose about one in five patients. They either miss a disease the patient has or erroneously tell the patient that she or he is sick.

What’s the biggest delivery room emergency?

Shoulder dystocia, which is the biggest delivery room emergency, means the baby’s head and shoulders are so large the baby becomes lodged in the mother’s birth canal.

Why are punitive damages so high in medical negligence cases?

Unless punitive damages are large, doctors will not change the way they do business.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.