Electronic Health Records Leading to More Medical Malpractice Claims

Posted on

A 2017 study released by The Doctor’s Company indicates that Electronic Health Records have been implicated in several medical malpractice lawsuits. How are health records becoming an increasing problem for patients and doctors? One of the main reasons seems to be faulty software and failure to (digitally) communicate.

 

Record Software Leads to Medical Malpractice Suits

While doctors are still responsible for taking an accurate history and ensuring the safety of their interventions, reliance on electronic records has created a more serious problem—one that it was meant to solve. Ideally, electronic records allow doctors to easily communicate with one another, update patient records in real-time, and ensure that drug allergies and other major threats are contained. However, the EHR software doesn’t appear to be working as advertised. This has resulted in:

 

  • Fragmented EHRs – A patient’s record may not update when a doctor prescribes a new medication or a doctor treats a new medical condition. This leaves doctors unaware of potential medication side effects or interactions.

 

 

  • Lack of access to EHRs – In some cases, health care professionals cannot access a patient’s EHR at all. If the doctor is able to speak to the patient directly, they can ask them about allergies, medications, and recent surgeries. But in serious emergency room situations, they’re going in blind. In some cases, lab results are never sent to doctors.

 

 

  • Poor recordkeeping ability – In some cases, EHR software does not allow doctors to add notes that could be important for other doctors to know. There are only checkboxes or dropdown menus that offer insufficient options for documentation.

 

 

  • Data routing failure – When a doctor orders lab tests through an EHR, the lab may never get the request or upon getting the request and performing the test, are not able to send the results back to the doctor.

 

 

  • Lack of safeguards and alerts – EHR software lacks sufficient fail-safes to ensure that, if a lab test is ordered, the test has been performed and received. In cases where two drugs might interact poorly, there are no alerts sent to doctors concerning the problem.

 

 

  • Integration problems between hospital departments – The report showed that emergency room records and specialists, even in the same hospital, had unintegrated systems that may not provide the same information.

 

 

  • Security problems – The report also indicated that there were security holes in the software that could be accessed by hackers. 

 

 

  • Data conversion failures – In some cases, a record needed to be converted from one file type to another. This resulted in the loss of data or unreadable records. 

 

 

EHR Failure is No Excuse for Medical Negligence

With some exceptions, hospitals and doctors are expected to have accurate patient records and, failing that, get an accurate patient record when possible. Since the EHR failures are well documented, doctors who don’t take full histories of their patients are guilty of medical negligence when their patients are injured. If you’ve been injured by medical negligence, call the Kansas City, MO personal injury attorneys at the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm today.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.