My Car Was Struck By an Autonomous Vehicle!

Posted on

Relatively few people in the U.S. can make this claim. Yet it does happen, and it’s likely to happen more often the closer we come to our brave new world. Autonomous vehicles are touted as the ultimate solution to human error. They won’t violate speed limits. They won’t drive intoxicated. And they won’t fail to check their blind spots before changing lanes.

On the other hand, they do create a bit of a legal problem in terms of liability. What would happen if an autonomous vehicle were to glitch out or make a mistake, and this resulted in a serious injury? Below, we’ll discuss some of the possibilities.

 

AI and Product Liability Lawsuits 

For technical legal reasons, AI and any software are not considered a product, but a service. As a service, it is not held to the same strict liability as other products. For instance, if a tire on your car were to blow out while you were driving, you could claim that the manufacturer defectively made the tire and that they’re responsible for your injuries. As long as you weren’t negligent in the maintenance of the tire, you would be able to recover damages. In other words, you wouldn’t have to prove negligence, since it is assumed that any product manufacturer owes their customers a duty of care to ensure that their products are made safely.

The software doesn’t work that way, largely because software manufacturers have successfully lobbied legislators to be considered service as opposed to a product. Software comes with strict licensing agreements that may absolve software engineers of any liability if their product fails. When you sign an end-user license agreement, you are essentially saying that you are waiving some of your rights to pursue litigation. These conditions of use have largely been upheld by the courts. 

However, there is a second consideration that needs to be considered, and it involves basic traffic laws. Legislators have a vested interest in ensuring the public good, and they don’t want vehicles out on the road that is beyond the reach of accountability. If an AI performs an illegal traffic maneuver, the company or companies responsible for manufacturing the AI could be held liable.

 

Self-Driving Car Strikes Motorcyclist 

In one case, a self-driving car struck a motorcyclist. At the time of the accident, the police blamed the collision on the motorcyclist, but the motorcyclist was able to settle the lawsuit with GM, which manufactured the AI. GM claimed that the motorcyclist was lane-splitting while the motorcyclist claimed he was attempting to enter a lane that the self-driving car was exiting. When the self-driving car recognized that there was another car speeding up the lane left of it, the self-driving car pulled back into the original lane, striking the motorcyclist. The details of the settlement with the motorcyclist were not announced, nor did GM admit fault in the case.

 

Talk to a Kansas City, MO Car Accident Attorney Today

If you’ve been struck by an autonomous or non-autonomous vehicle, the attorneys at the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm can help you recover damages from the liable party. Talk to us today for a free consultation.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.