What is the Average Payout for Medical Negligence?

Posted on

The first question that needs to be asked is what must a victim/plaintiff prove to obtain maximum compensation in a medical negligence case? Mostly because of punitive damages, the average payout in a negligence case is rather high. Examples of medical malpractice include birth injuries, surgical errors and medication administration errors. Dangerous drug injuries, like injuries due to unadvertised side-effects, are the manufacturer’s responsibility and not a doctor’s responsibility, at least in most cases.

A Kansas City personal injury attorney has both the burden of proof and the burden of persuasion. The burden of proof is basically convincing a judge in a pretrial hearing. The burden of persuasion involves persuading jurors at trial.

Preponderance of the Evidence

This legalese term means “more likely than not.” Picture two equally sized stacks of typing paper sitting side by side. If someone moves a single sheet from the stack on the left to the stack on the right, the stack on the right is taller than the one on the left. That’s an image of the preponderance of the evidence.

The burden of proof is much higher in criminal court. O.J. Simpson was acquitted in criminal court. Then, a civil jury heard the same evidence and reached the opposite result.

This scale applies to the greater weight of credible evidence. In medical negligence cases, experts on different sides usually have completely different opinions. Jurors decide which witness is more credible.

Clear and Convincing Evidence

This intermediate standard applies to punitive damages in medical malpractice claims. Jurors may award these damages if there is clear and convincing evidence that the defendant intentionally disregarded a known risk.

To put this standard in perspective, clear and convincing evidence is usually the burden of proof in child custody cases. Most parents would want jurors to be very certain before they agreed to let the state remove children from their home.

The average payout in a medical negligence case varies significantly, largely depending on the evidence. For a free consultation with an experienced personal injury attorney in Kansas City, contact the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm. We do not charge upfront legal fees in these matters.

FAQs

What’s the difference between medical malpractice and medical negligence?

These concepts are the same. Malpractice usually refers to professional negligence, like medical malpractice or legal malpractice.

How soon will my claim settle?

Very few medical malpractice claims settle quickly. These claims are usually very complex.

What is the assumption of the risk defense?

This defense excuses negligence in some cases. A surgical waiver might, or might not, support the assumption of the risk defense.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.