When Pedestrians Are at Fault

Posted on

Collisions with pedestrians and vehicles can be some of the most traumatic events due to the complete lack of protection that the pedestrian has. Often, the pedestrian suffers serious injury or death. In 2013, 4,735 pedestrians were killed and 66,000 were severely injured in traffic accidents, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. In the majority of vulnerable road user accidents, such as an accident with a pedestrians, the driver is at fault. Common examples of negligence include failure to yield, driver distraction, lack of proper observance (failing to see the pedestrian), and speeding. However, in some cases the pedestrian may be found at fault for negligence. In some cases the driver of the car may actually be able to recover damages from the pedestrian or their insurance provider if they were found to be negligent and caused physical injury or property damage to the driver.

 

Jaywalking

 

Before the 1920s, pedestrians and other vulnerable road users had the right to the road. However, this caused car traffic to move at a slower pace and made driving less practical. With pedestrians holding up the growing number of vehicles on the road, the automotive industry initiated a campaign to force pedestrians off the roads to make room for cars. They popularized the term “jaywalking” by referring to people who illegally crossed the roads as “jays,” which used to be a term to describe a simple country person, according to the BBC. With the automotive industry’s successful campaign, road speeds could be increased as walking on the road in undesignated areas became illegal. A pedestrian may be deemed at fault if they cross a street outside of a crosswalk, against the traffic signal, if walking along bridges, highways, or other undesignated walking areas. However, the pedestrian may not always be found at fault in these scenarios. Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, meaning that negligence may be divided between multiple parties. If the pedestrian crossed a crosswalk against the signal, but the driver was speeding, both parties may be negligent to some degree. The party that is more at fault will not be able to receive any compensation for their damages, and the party that was less at fault will only be able to recover a percentage of the total damages that they would have been entitled to had they not been found at all negligent.

 

Intoxication

 

Another cause of pedestrian accidents is intoxication. In fact, intoxication is responsible for almost half of all fatal pedestrian accidents. In 34 percent of fatal pedestrian crashes, the pedestrian had a blood alcohol content of 0.08 or higher. However, drivers were intoxicated in a large percentage of fatal pedestrian crashes as well. In 15 percent of fatal pedestrian crashes, the driver had a blood alcohol content of 0.08 or higher. If the pedestrian was intoxicated as well as crossing a street illegal (not in a crosswalk) there is a good chance that they will be held responsible, not the driver. If you have been injured in any type of traffic accident, as a pedestrian or as a driver, contact the Kansas City, Missouri, auto accident attorneys of the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm today.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.