Who is the Plaintiff When a Loved One Dies Due to Negligence?

Posted on

When you lose a loved one due to someone else’s careless or reckless conduct, it can be heartbreaking and leave your entire family feeling lost and confused. Unfortunately, the law doesn’t give you a lot of time to grieve before important decisions have to be made. Familydoctor.org suggests that the typical active grieving period can take as long as four years or more before the surviving loved one begins to feel normal again after losing a loved one.

Naturally, everyone’s experience will be different. Of course, in most situations, the statutes of limitations on bringing a lawsuit for your loved one’s death may expire well before that time. So, it’s very important to contact a wrongful death lawyer as soon as possible, even if you aren’t sure if there is a case. Still, families are often concerned about which person should be in charge of pursuing a claim.

Types of Claims You Can Bring on Behalf of a Loved One

When a person dies due to negligence of any kind (auto accident, medical malpractice, defective medical device, etc.), there are generally two basic ways that the family can bring an action against the party responsible. These are either (1) wrongful death or (2) survival. The differences are very important.

wrongful death accident lawyers in kansas city.jpg

What is Wrongful Death?

Under Section 537.080 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, a wrongful death case is one that is brought by the next-of-kin of the decedent. You might say, this claim belongs to the living. There is a hierarchy of who may act as the plaintiff in these cases. The law goes group by group, so if there is no one available from one category, then the right to bring the case would pass to the next category, and so forth:

  1. A spouse, adult child, or any lineal descendant of a deceased child (grandchildren);
  2. Siblings or nephews and nieces of the decedent; or
  3. A plaintiff ad litem (this is a person the court appoints to pursue the action. It is rare).

The key to keep in mind is that only one person can serve as plaintiff at a time. Any money recovered will be divided among the surviving loved ones according to the degrees of dependency (the nature and degree of their relationships and dependence on the decedent). So, it is possible for a nephew or a grandchild to recover more than a child. It will all depend on the nature and extent of the relationships. After all, a wrongful death case is designed to compensate the living for their loss. Therefore, the plaintiff (and any loved ones) will have to prove that relationship.

What is a Survival Action?

Under Section 537.020 of the Missouri Revised Statutes, a survival action is one that is brought by the representative of the decedent’s estate. You might say, this claim belongs to the dead. It is a possession of the decedent – a right, if you will, that could have been realized during the decedent’s life, had he or she not died. Death does not need to be related. A person may have a pending action for an injury during life, but then die due to something completely unrelated. The law allows his or her estate to continue pursuing the case to recover funds that would have passed to heirs through the estate.

The key to remember is that a probate court will have to administer the estate. A probate judge will divide any possible recovery among the heirs according to the will or, if there is no will, according to the state’s default rules. In a survival action, the degree of relationship between the decedent and loved ones is irrelevant.

Hiring a Kansas City Wrongful Death Lawyer

If you’ve lost someone close to you because of negligence, don’t speculate about your rights. Get real help today. The attorneys of the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm are happy to speak with you for free and review the facts and circumstances of your unique case. Sometimes, just talking to an experienced attorney can help you make an informed choice about how to proceed. The call is free, and we never take a fee unless we are able to help you recover compensation.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.