Skip to main content
Maui Fire Litigation

Maui Fire Litigation Update

By February 11, 2025February 12th, 2025No Comments

The Supreme Court of Hawaii addressed three concerning the subrogation rights of property and casualty insurers involved in the Maui Fire Cases.

Analysis of Questions:

  1. Application of Yukumoto v. Tawarahara:
    • The court affirmed that the holding in Yukumoto v. Tawarahara, which limited health insurers’ subrogation rights to reimbursement via liens under HRS § 663-10, extends to property and casualty insurers. This means that such insurers are similarly restricted to recovering funds through the statutory lien mechanism under HRS § 431:13-103(a)(10)(A) when their insured settles with a third-party tortfeasor. This means insurance companies can’t sue the person who caused the damage directly to recover money they’ve paid out; they must do it through this lien process
  2. Impact of Settlement on Subrogation Rights:
    • The court clarified that an insurer’s subrogation rights are not prejudiced by the insured’s releaseof a tortfeasor, provided that the settlement documentation explicitly preserves those rights under HRS § 663-10. Thus, the statutory lien remains the exclusive remedy, negating any independent action by the insurer against the tortfeasor based on the insured’s settlement.
  3. The “Made Whole” Doctrine in Mass Tort Context:
    • The court declined to apply the “made whole” doctrine, which typically requires that an insured be fully compensated for losses before an insurer can pursue subrogation. In the context of this mass tort litigation, the court ruled that insurers need not wait for the insured to be made whole before exercising their subrogation rights under the statutory framework of HRS §§ 431:13-103(a)(10) and 663-10.

This case will likely be appealed to the United States Supreme Court for further review.

This decision was made considering the specific context of the mass tort litigation involved, where applying such a doctrine could complicate or delay the recovery process for insureds, potentially affecting the overall resolution of claims in this large-scale disaster scenario.

This ruling provides significant guidance on how subrogation and recovery rights are managed under Hawaii law in complex mass tort scenarios, particularly emphasizing the exclusivity of statutory liens and the non-applicability of the made whole doctrine in these circumstances.