Boy Scout Sexual Abuse

Background

Thousands of Scouts were sexually abused by employees and volunteers of the Boy Scouts of America (“BSA”). Many of these victims courageously came forward, and filed abuse cases against the BSA, seeking to hold it accountable for its actions, and inactions. As a result, the BSA filed for bankruptcy protection on February 18, 2020 in the United States Bankruptcy Court of the District of Delaware. The BSA’s decision to file for bankruptcy has affected over 82,000 survivors who have filed sexual abuse claims.

Krause & Kinsman has the privilege of representing nearly 7,000 Scouts who were victimized by the BSA, and is committed to helping these survivors navigate the intricacies of this litigation to ensure they receive the compensation that they deserve.

This is the largest sexual abuse case against a single organization in the history of the United States. Judge Laurie Selber Silverstein is the presiding Judge over the case, which includes the 82,000 abuse victim’s claims. As such, Judge Silverstein has appointed the Tort Claims Committee (“TCC”) to lead the case on behalf of the abuse victims, in order to help manage this massive litigation.

The Bankruptcy Case

The Bankruptcy Court required BSA to propose a plan for how it would handle the 82,000 sexual abuse claims brought against it. After two years of litigation, BSA proposed a plan. This plan was voted on by abuse survivors, and Krause & Kinsman was able to secure votes from 70% of the clients it represents. The votes collected from survivors provided overwhelming support for approval of the plan.

From there a confirmation trial was held, which lasted almost four weeks and included 26 witnesses, over 1,000 exhibits, and six days of oral arguments from attorneys. Judge Silverstein issued her written opinion on July 29, 2022. Then all of the parties negotiated with the judge and mediators regarding revisions to the plan, which ultimately ended with the plan being approved by Judge Silverstein on September 8, 2022.

The plan is hundreds of pages long, but primarily focuses on three parts. First, the plan establishes an independent trust with approximately $2.5 billion to pay for abuse claims. Second, the plan provides a procedure for examining each abuse claim to determine its legitimacy and value, and outlines a path to compensation for abuse survivors. Third, the plan provides a thoughtful and transparent Youth Protection Program to protect Scouts from abuse going forward.

The Current Status

Judge Silverstein’s approval of the plan was a monumental step in this litigation, and has brought survivors one step closer to obtaining compensation. However, parties who were dissatisfied with the plan’s approval have appealed. The briefing on these appeals must be completed by December 21, 2022. From there, the District Court will likely set oral argument, and then issue a ruling on the appeals.   

It is important to note that in order for the settlement trust to get up and running, an effective date for the trust needs to be obtained. However, an effective date cannot be obtained until the District Court affirms the Bankruptcy’s Court’s decision. In the event the District Court does affirm the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, parties could then appeal that decision to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Doing so does not automatically issue a stay on the bankruptcy proceedings, but if a stay were to be granted by the Circuit Court the settlement trust would not be able to take effect until a decision was rendered, which could take a year or more.

However, there is no way to guarantee or predict exactly how this will play out. Although this case has been going on for two and a half years, we will continue to have to wait while the appellate process is completed. Once the plan is finally approved, and becomes effective, the claims evaluation process will begin. As such, it is impossible to know if the Plan will be approved, and if so when victims will be paid. We are hopeful that will happen in the next 6-18 months, but will have to patiently wait and see what happens.

Krause & Kinsman continues to fight for its clients who have been victimized by the BSA, and will do everything it can to ensure they receive the compensation they deserve.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.