What if I am Injured in a Car Accident and I am Partially at Fault?

Posted on

You may still be entitled to compensation if you are involved in a car accident in which you are partially at fault. Say you are driving down the highway. The car next to you begins to swerve in your lane. You start to get nervous and swerve yourself. Somewhere along the way you overcorrect and send your vehicle spinning down the highway and you hit another car. You then seek medical treatment at the hospital for your injuries. After you are discharged from the hospital, you go and make a claim with you and the other party’s insurance company. The insurance companies ask you for the police report.

After obtaining the police report, you notice that witnesses, including yourself, stated to emergency responders that you overcorrected after swerving, which caused you to hit another vehicle. This scenario will surely give the insurance company enough information to deny your claim. They will put all of the blame on you, especially if you do not have an experienced car accident attorney. Placing the blame on you will relieve the insurance companies from ever having to pay you a dime—unless you keep fighting! Here are a few tips to make sure you put yourself in the best negotiation position possible when making a claim to an insurance company:

Do not tell anyone involved that you believe you were at fault

First, you may not be at fault. You do not know what can unfold once witness statements are taken. This is very important to remember. The insurance adjuster assigned to your case was not at the scene of the accident. He or she was not a witness, and can only evaluate what happened based on statements and written documents and diagrams. Since the adjuster was not present, they can only examine hearsay to determine whether or not you were at fault. Do not give them the dagger by telling emergency personnel or witnesses that you believe you are at fault. Do not even use the word “overcorrected”. Be very general with your statements.

Contact an attorney to help you make your claim

An experienced car accident attorney will know how to present your claim to the insurance company without suggesting you were at total fault for the accident. If the insurance company claims you were at fault, then an attorney should give candid arguments in your favor. You will want an attorney who is going to fight for you. He or she will understand the reports, diagrams and statements, which is important to develop your claim/case. An experienced car accident attorney will also know how to maximize your compensation if you were partially at fault.

It is no secret that a lot of personal injury car accident claims are settled before a lawsuit even has to be filed. This keeps the local Kansas City courts from being flooded with lawsuits. But if you were partially at fault for the car accident, your claim may have to be filed as a lawsuit. Do not be fearful if this is the route your case has to take. Some cases have to be filed in order for you to receive maximum compensation. It also might be better to get your case in front of an opposing attorney, rather than deal with an insurance adjuster who is surely there to minimize and downplay your injuries.

[Does My Car Accident Injury Claim Have To Go To Trial?]

If your case goes to trial, the jury, if it is a jury trial, or the Judge, if it is a bench trial, will assess who was at fault and how much each person was at fault. This is called comparative fault. In Missouri car accident cases, your percentage of fault will decrease your damages proportionately, but it will not keep you from receiving compensation. Say a jury found you 20% at fault, but believed you deserved $50,000 for your pain and injuries. You will actually be awarded $40,000 when it is all said and done because the Judge will have to take away 20% ($10,000) of your $50,000 award because the jury found you 20% at fault. In Kansas car accident cases, the same deduction will be applied unless you were found to be 50% or more at fault. If you are found to be 50% or more at fault then you will be awarded nothing. This is one of the toughest parts about being injured in a Kansas car accident.

One thing to remember is that not all cases that are filed have to actually go to trial. Negotiations can still occur, and most often do occur. The experienced car accident attorneys at Krause & Kinsman will guide you through this process and make sure your voice is heard. We understand and have experienced the blame insurance companies place on our clients, and we know how to fight back. Call our office today at 816-200-2900 for a free consultation.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.