The Complications of Shared Fault in a Car Accident

Posted on

In cases where two drivers in an accident both did something wrong that contributed to the accident, each driver is assigned some of the blame. This is done as a percentage. For instance, one driver may be given 25 percent of the blame while the other driver is given 75 percent of the blame. In Missouri, because we use a “pure” form of comparative negligence. Each driver would be entitled to recover their damages minus their percentage of the blame. 

For instance, let’s say one driver who was given 75 percent of the blame for an accident suffers $50,000 in total damages. That driver would be entitled to recover $12,500, or $50,000 – (75 percent of $50,000). Their damages are reduced by their amount of fault.

If the other driver, however, only has $10,000 in damages and they are considered 25 percent at fault, then they would be able to recover $10,000 – (25 percent of $10,000) or $7,500. The two figures then offset one another meaning that the driver who is 75 percent responsible for the accident gets a total award of $12,500 – $7,500 or $5,000.

Now, $5,000 is only 10 percent of their overall damages and represents a significant monetary loss of $45,000. So one way to increase that number is to reduce the percentage of liability that the driver who has been assigned 75 percent of the fault has.

 

Disputing Partial Fault in a Car Accident

In serious car accidents, police will come to the scene and may give out tickets to drivers who they believe caused the accident. They will then put their thoughts in a police report which becomes one of the main official documents that concern your case.

While police may have good reason to believe one driver caused the accident over another, their main concern is making sure everyone is safe and clearing the scene so that traffic can continue. In other words, they often get it wrong. You shouldn’t think that a ticket or a discouraging police report is cause not to pursue a case against a driver who you believe is at fault for an accident.

Part of this is not admitting guilt for the ticket. If you admit guilt, the other driver’s insurance company will almost definitely use it against you regardless of what happened. This will reduce your potential award as it becomes more likely that your fault can be established in the case. 

If you talk to the insurance company at all before getting a Kansas City car accident lawyer (which we don’t advise) don’t admit guilt and contest any statements they make concerning your potential blame. 

 

Talk to a Kansas City Car Accident Attorney Today

If you’ve been injured in a car accident and the insurance company wants to pin some of the blame on you or make you out to be the primary at-fault party, the attorneys at Krause & Kinsman can help you fight those claims. Call us today for more information.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.