Direct and Indirect Employment DIscrimination Claims

Posted on

Every year, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission handles thousands of employment discrimination claims. Yet for every claim the EEOC handles and resolves, there are probably two or three others that the EREOC refuses to accept.

Much of this gap is related to staffing. The EEOC is a rather small government agency with limited resources. Politics plays a role as well. The EEOC generally only accepts claims which jive with its political agenda, whatever its agenda might be at that particular time.

So, if you have an employment discrimination claim and the EEOC refuses to act on it, that refusal does not mean your claim is weak or invalid. That refusal simply gives you a chance to partner with a Kansas City employment discrimination lawyer who is dedicated to you, as opposed to a philosophical agenda.

Protected Employment CLasses

The 1964 Civil Rights Act sets forth a number of protected classifications. These classifications are so broad that pretty much every worker in the Kansas City area belongs to at least one of them. Some of these protected classes include:

  • Gender,
  • Ethnicity,
  • National origin,
  • Religion,
  • Age,
  • Disability, and
  • Sexual oreintation.

The Supreme Court recently expanded the sexual orientation category to include gender identity.

The law also protects certain activities, mosty with regard to labor organization. Some examples include trying to form a union, sympathyzing with a union, and discussing working conditions with fellow employees.

Disparate Treatment Bias

Some employers ignore the Civil Rights Act and treat different employees differently simply because they are different. Unequal leave time is a good example. Many companies have generous maternity leave policies, but limited paternity leave. 

Generally, financial compensation is quite high in these cases. Jurors are often anxious to punish employers who flaunt the law and intentionally discriminate.

There is a difference between intentional and malicious. Let’s return to the previous example. Most employers do not look down upon fathers or feel their contributions are unnecessary. However, different leave policies is clearly disparate treatment discrimination.

Disparate Impact

Another employment discrimination is indirect. Some employers have policies that disproportionately affect people in protected classes.

A mandatory Saturday policy is a good example. Among many religions, Saturdays are holy days. Affected employees can usually find someone to switch shifts with or make other accommodations. But employers must accommodate employees, and not the other way around.

As a side note, religious beliefs do not need to be orthodox or even widely held to be protected. They only must be sincere.

Job bias comes in many forms. For a free consultation with an experienced employment discrimination lawyer in Kansas City, contact the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm. We do not charge upfront legal fees in these cases.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.