Why Most Missouri Car Accident Cases Don’t Go to Trial

Posted on

Recently, we wrote an article about whether your car accident case has to go to trial. After we wrote that article, I read a blog post by Christopher Small out of Seattle answering the question as to ‘why most car accident lawsuits settle before trial’.

Chris gives four main reasons why most car accidents cases settle before trial:

    1.  The system is set up to avoid jury trials…

Our Court Systems would not function properly if we had to try every single dispute that came across my desk. At the beginning of every case we try to negotiate with insurance companies to pay you the money that you deserve. We will provide the insurance company medical records, billing records and properly describe how the accident occurred and why they should pay you money for your car accident. If you’d like to read more about the money you are owed after an accident read here:

[What type of Compensation Can I Receive if I am in a Car Accident?]

Car Accident| Krause & Kinsman

    2.  If One Side Has a Clear Advantage

Chris is right, if one side has a clear advantage the other side is likely going to settle. We try to push and get the most compensation possible for our clients and so we will likely go to trial a bit more than most lawyers. However, if someone is drunk driving, speeding excessively, not obeying traffic laws, texting and driving or there is clear liability, they do not want to be in front of a jury. The jury could punish them.

    3.  One Side Doesn’t Have a Clear AdvantageCar Accident

Christ talks about how lawyers are risk adverse and they won’t take a case to trial if there isn’t a clear advantage. I would agree and disagree with his assessment. Most lawyers are risk adverse. We represent out clients on contingency and we do not want to lose. However, I take pride in taking very difficult cases. I take cases that other lawyers turn down, and have made my clients a lot of money in doing that. Recently, we saved a client 2 million dollars after a 2-day arbitration—this case was turned down by 13 lawyers. We also just settled a case for 150,000 dollars after only being our client for 60 days—this case was settled after being with another lawyer for 2 years.

    4.  Juries are Crazy

I actually don’t believe juries are crazy. However, insurance companies believe that juries are sometimes unpredictable. We have all heard about run-away juries. Insurance companies will sometimes settle a claim because they are scared that a jury might punish them.

    5.  Most Attorney are Scared to Go to Trial

I agree. Most lawyers are scared to go to trial. It takes a lot of work for a lawyer to go to trial. There are depositions that need to be taken, trial preparation, days off to actually try the case, experts need to be hired and its stressful. However, we are different, we love trial. There are some lawyers that hate being in front of a jury, we love the adrenaline rush and love representing our clients.

Krause & Kinsman

   6.  Most Clients Don’t Want to Go to Trial

I will add one point that Chris did not touch on; most clients don’t want to go to trial. We had a 12-hour mediation, arguing over several thousand dollars and our client insisted that we settle the case because she didn’t want to actually go to trial.

I think that most cases can be resolved before trial but we tell all our clients that sometimes we must go to trial because it keeps the insurance companies honest. Far to often we see lowball offers and we have to pressure the insurance company by preparing for trial.

If you have any questions about a Missouri car accident case, we can help you. We have helped hundreds of clients who have been in very serious car accident cases. We know how to work insurance companies and how to present your case to a jury. If you would like a free consultation, call us at 816-200-2900.

 

 

 

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.