What Happens When Texting and Driving Leads to a Car Accident in Kansas City, MO?

Posted on

According to findings from the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, cell phone ownership among adults has exceeded 90%. Up to 91% of adults now use cell phones according to the survey. Cell phones can thus be considered as the most widely adopted consumer technology in the world. Unfortunately, this rise in technology use can have dangerous side effects. Studies suggest that drivers who are often texting and driving are 23 times more likely to be involved in a car accident.

In Missouri, 1700 crashes were found to be cell-phone related in 2016. Fourteen people died and 816 people were injured due to the actions of cell-phone related distracted drivers. The Department of Transportation says that approximately 80% of accidents in Missouri are due to some form of distraction. 

texting and driving accident lawyer
Have you been injured in a texting and driving accident? Contact Krause & Kinsman today!

Texting and Driving Laws in Kansas City, MO

With respect to texting and driving, the law in Kansas City is as follows:

  • It is illegal for all drivers to text while sitting behind the wheel. This is a primary law and it prohibits all drivers from sending, receiving or typing text messages while driving. This law is not just limited to text messages but also applies to instant messages and emails.
  • Novice drivers (those who have a learner’s permit and intermediate license holders) are prohibited from using all forms of cell phone use while driving. This includes both hand-held and hands-free cell phone use.
  • Licensed drivers (who are not considered novice) are permitted to talk on a handheld phone.
  • Texting is considered a primary offense which means that if an officer sees you doing it, they do not need another reason to pull you over. They can stop you and ticket you for it. 


These texting laws are not applicable on:

  • any law enforcement officers or emergency service personnel who has to text within the course and scope of their duty;
  • a person who is simply reading or entering a phone number or name on his device in order to either receive or make a call;
  • a person who receives an emergency, traffic or weather alert;
  • a person who receives a message which is related to the operation or navigation of their vehicle;
  • a person who is in the process of reporting an illegal activity to the law enforcement authorities;
  • a person who does it to prevent injury to a person or property.

The Gap in Texting Laws in Kansas City, MO

The biggest problem with cell phone usage and texting laws in Kansas City, MO is the fact that there is no statewide limit on cell phone usage by adult drivers. In fact, after the initial texting ban, there has been no further advancement in cell legislation. There is a definite need to modernize texting and cell phone legislation in Kansas. Cell phone use should be discouraged and prohibitions should be imposed on engaging with electronic devices altogether.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) has been advocating a complete ban on cell phone usage including talking and texting while driving even with hands-free-devices. While there are some states and cities that have already implemented this, Kansas City is still among the few that only bans texting while driving and has not yet prohibited drivers from talking on their phones

To date, laws in Missouri mainly focus on barring teens from using a cell phone while driving and while this is understandable since teen drivers are more prone to get into accidents when they are distracted, it is important to ban cell phone usage, hands-free or otherwise, for everyone. This ban should not be limited to novice and teen drivers.

It is important to understand that it is not necessary that only inexperienced drivers can be negligent if they use their cell phone. Cell phones are a distraction for everyone and it is one distraction that should be kept completely at bay while driving. Even moms, rushing their children, to and from school or people who are late for work can be distracted and can make a mistake if they continue to use their cell phones while driving. Distracting driving is a major problem and the laws should be designed to reduce the number of distractions for drivers.

Proposed Legislative Changes

There is no doubt that efforts have been made to improve cell phone usage laws in Missouri. Five bills were filed in 2017, several of which had been proposed earlier but without any success. House Bill 295 was proposed that wanted to completely outlaw the use of handheld devices while driving. The bill still allowed hands-free usage but the Bill did not get a hearing. Similarly, House Bill 312 proposed barring drivers from using handheld communication devices while allowing hands-free usage. The bill also proposed double fines in school and work zones but this bill also did not get a hearing. House Bill 378 proposed making texting illegal for all drivers unless using hands-free technology and House Bill 546 proposed barring texting by drivers of all ages. Both bills were not heard. Senate Bill 165 wanted to apply the ban on text messaging for all drivers but did not get a hearing.

Consult with a Kansas City Car Accident Attorney

Clearly, distracted driving continues to be an issue and adult drivers continue to use their cell phones while driving. If you have been in an accident that is a result of distracted driving and if you are unsure of how to proceed or how to file a claim for any injuries that you may have incurred, contact our lawyers at Krause & Kinsman today.  Distracting driving is a major problem and more and more people are getting injured in accidents that are due to drivers who are negligent because they are too busy or too distracted by their cell phones. Call us now at 1 816-200-2900 and one of our associates will be happy to assist you. Our legal team has significant experience in dealing with similar car accident cases. Talk to us today and give us all the necessary information so we can initiate the process of filing for your claims and getting you the compensation you deserve.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.