The Kansas City Streetcar

Posted on

A few weeks ago, the Kansas City streetcar hit a Mercedes parked on the street. This was the first incident since the streetcar began testing in November. The streetcar runs from Union Station to River Market and is said to begin carrying passengers in early May of 2016. Officials have been actively warning drivers of the dangers of parking outside of the designated white line. Due to the streetcar’s width, drivers must park within 12 inches of the curb to avoid its path. Parking outside the white line puts your property at risk. What happens if your parked inside the line and the streetcar hits you? Better yet, what happens in any situation in which you and a public transportation vehicle collide? Is the public transportation provider liable?

Duty of Care

 

Most personal injury cases are based on negligence rules. The injured person must prove that the defendant was negligent in order to win the case. To be “negligent” is to act (or fail to act) in a way that violates a duty you owe to another individual. In the case of car accidents, the duty is the one that all drivers owe to other drivers on the road. If you get behind the wheel of a car, you owe a legal duty to everyone else on the road to operate your vehicle with a reasonable standard of care.

Common Carrier Law

 

When an accident involves a public transportation vehicle, negligence rules still apply. However, the streetcar, like other public transportation vehicles in many states, is subject to what is called a “common carrier” law. A common carrier is any public transportation provider. Common carriers owe their passengers a higher degree of care than the average person does. Common carriers are said to owe passengers “the highest degree of care” in regards to transportation. The injured party must still prove the common carrier operator was negligent but the threshold is easier due to this heightened degree of requisite care.

 

Filing a Claim Against a Common Carrier

Another important difference in collisions involving common carriers is the claims process. Unlike other car accident cases, specific procedures and laws apply when being a tort claim against a state or municipal agency. If you have been injured or if your vehicle suffered damage in a collision with a public transportation vehicle, contact an experienced car accident attorney today to discuss your options for seeking damages from the common carrier. Contact a Kansas City, Missouri, car accident attorney at the Krause & Kinsman Law Firm today for a free consultation.

Our Reputation

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is made up of some of the nation’s foremost legal minds in the mass-tort field. That’s why our clients & co-counsel partners choose us.

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee, and Co-Chair of the Law & Briefing Committee in MDL 2846:

In Re: Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc., Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2974:

In Re: Paragard IUD Products Liability Litigation

Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee in MDL 2924:

In Re: Zantac (Ranitidine) Products Liability Litigation

Along with the aforementioned MDLs,

Plaintiff’s Counsel has prosecuted thousands of cases across other Multi-District Litigations and Mass-Torts, including:

MDL No. 3043:

Acetaminophen ASD/ADHD Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2753:

Atrium Medical Corp. C-Qur Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2782:

Ethicon Physiomesh Flexible Composite Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 627:

In Re: Physiomesh Litigation, MCL

MCL No. 633:

In Re: Prolene Hernia System Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2750:

Cook Medical, Inc., IVC Filters Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2641:

Bard IVC Filters Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2326:

In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2606:

Benicar (Olmesartan) Product Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2666:

In Re: Forced Air Warming Devices Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2591:

Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation

MDL No. 2936:

In Re: Smity’s/CAM2303 Tractor Hydraulic Fluid Marketing, Sales Practices and Products Liability Litigation

MCL No. 630:

In Re: Proceed Mesh Litigation

MDL No. 2543:

In Re: General Motors LLC Ignition Switch Litigation

MDL No. 2004:

In Re: Mentor Corp. ObTape Transobturator Sling Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2187:

In Re: C. R. Bard, Inc. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2325:

In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2327:

In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 2387:

In Re: Coloplast Corp. Pelvic Support Systems Products Liability Litigation

MDL No. 251:

In Re: Neomedic Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation

Highly Awarded Trial Attorneys

The Krause & Kinsman Law Firm is one of the nation’s leading mass-tort & personal-injury law firms. The founding partners, Adam & Robert, have been selected to serve on steering committees for some of the largest pharmaceutical mass-tort cases.

Working With Us

Partnering with Krause & Kinsman is easy. When you partner with Krause & Kinsman, you can be sure that our mutual clients’ complex matters are handled with the utmost care and dedication. In addition to our top-notch representation, we will ensure our mutual clients receive frequent communication about the status of their cases.

Partner With Us

Why Us?

Recognized leaders in mass-torts with vast experience in complex litigation.

Your clients will appreciate the high-quality representation provided.

Your clients will consistently real-time updates on the status of their case via video, email, text, and phone.

Get real-time updates on the status of our mutual clients while their cases progress.

Collaborate on the case together and receive co-counsel fees.